Discussion #1

Discussion #1

by Allison Bailey -
Number of replies: 4

Hi! My name is Allison, and I am in 11th grade at Tallulah Falls School. I live in Lula, Georgia. I enjoy reading, being outside, and hanging out with my pets. I have a fish named Finley, a dog named Doodle, and a bearded dragon named Lester. We also have a goat and guinea fowl, which are loud but nice to have around. In this class, I simply want to learn the basics of why the mind works the way that it does. 


After reading both articles, I noticed several factors that could render the studies inaccurate. The findings of both articles are based solely on cross-sectional research, a method in which “a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time” (Spielman, 2014, p. 47).  The doctors performing the experiments admit that longitudinal data, which is data gathered over an extended period of time, “[has] been lacking” (Christakis, 2004, p.708). The method used to conduct the study was a survey, a technique that has several weaknesses. These weaknesses include the inability to “collect the same depth of information on each person that would be collected in a case study,” as well as the risk of inaccurate responses from the participants (Spielman, 2014, p.46). In addition, the results of a survey must be “generalized” to a larger population; in this case, the data regarding 2623 total children represents the entire youth population. 

The results of the study indicate that only 10% of the children surveyed at ages one and three showed attentional problems by age seven. The conclusion that “early television exposure is associated with attentional problems at age 7” is based off of a logistic regression model, which I have read to be a model that “estimates the probability of an event occurring…based on a given dataset of independent variables” (What Is Logistic Regression?, n.d, para.1). This indicates that the conclusion could possibly be inaccurate. 

Out of the subjects covered in Chapters 1 and 2, I found the section about Ivan Pavlov’s studies on behaviorism the most interesting because I just find the power of the unconscious mind fascinating. 

Thanks for reading!


References:

Christakis, D. A., Zimmerman, F. J., DiGiuseppe, D. L., & McCarty, C. A. (2004, April). Pediatrics. 113(4), 708.

Elias, M. (2004, August 30). Frequent TV Watching Shortens Kids’ Attention Spans. USA Today. www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-04-05-tv-kids-attention-usat_x.htm.

Spielman, R. M. (2014). Psychology. Openstax. 

What Is Logistic Regression?. IBM. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2023, from https://www.ibm.com/topics/logistic-regression.

407 words

In reply to Allison Bailey

Re: Discussion #1

by Raegan Duncan -
You make a very good point about how the survey used in the study generalizes the entire youth population! This added detail emphasizes the extent to which the research could be invalid. Reading the details you included made me go back to the textbook and read more about multicultural psychology, as I wondered if this could influence the results. Do you think that the diversity of the participants could have anything to do with the results? For example, if children of various upbringings were all represented in this study, could the results possibly be more accurate, even with the lack of longitudinal data?

103 words

In reply to Allison Bailey

Re: Discussion #1

by Jovana Dermanovic -
Adding to this discussion, I agree with your point of view; especially about the survey used in this study, which generalized a lot of the young population. Also, I find Ivan Pavlov's studies very interesting, and fascinating. Believe it or not, most people think that they don't have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but it is very common.
This question is not about the articles, but generally about ADHD; To what extent does prolonged engagement with electronic media, particularly TV screens, contribute to the development and exacerbation of ADHD- related cognitive impairments and executive dysfunction in the pediatric population? 
Amazing observation and point of view!  

105 words

In reply to Allison Bailey

Re: Discussion #1

by Timothy Beck -

Allison, to add to your ideas about the accuracy of the article and studies, I believe a variable you missed was that the data does not cover a wide enough age gap. As you stated, the size of the case study is not large enough to represent accurate data, I also believe that the data collectors need to continue to follow the attention spans of these subjects as they continue to form into adults. Do you think that subjects may have factors that make them more prone to shortened attention spans? Perhaps gender has an effect on the attention rate. I absolutely agree with your views on the provided data and I am happy to hear from you.

       Thank you,

                Timothy Beck

122 words

In reply to Allison Bailey

Re: Discussion #1

by Lillian Farrar -

Hello Allison,


Thank you for sharing your insight, and learning with the class! I greatly appreciate you, and your opinion. I could not have put it into more adequate words myself. I do agree with the fact that it is greatly possible that the information presented in both articles could be deemed inaccurate. There are multiple factors that support this statement. The weakness in support is most definitely a factor in the technique used in conducting research. Lack of evidence leads to lack of statement.  I also found the information on Pavlov's dog interesting, Thank you for sharing your opinion! 


Sincerely,

Lilly Kate Farrar 

104 words