Discussion #1

Discussion #1

by Jovana Dermanovic -
Number of replies: 3

Hello, my name is Jovana Dermanovic, I am from Novi Sad, Serbia. I am a junior at Tallulah Falls School, and I do track and field, and swimming. My favorite color is yellow. My birthday is in November, and I have a dog that is a mix of a white puddle and an apricot poodle. I love hanging out with my friends, going to coffee shops, and talking about everything. Psychology really interests me, and I think it is the root of every job in the world if you understand it, it will help you better understand people and how they work. 

After briefly reading both of the articles, it is clear that the research had some slips. The first article "Early Television Exposure and Subsequent Problems in Children" is scientific that is more accurate and can be used as correct data. You can see that the article had few scientists that talked about this topic and gave out data that were more detailed than the second article which was, "Frequent TV Watching Shortens Kids' Attention Spans". Journalists did an okay job but there were some slips. As we see the results were summarized from the cross-sectional research; collecting data took a shorter amount of time, which can be of service, but in this case, it is not, that is opposed to the longitudinal method.
Freud's theory was very interesting to me about this topic; because kids at the age of seven, and younger are unconscious while watching a TV screen, which affects their conscious behavior, and it makes it difficult for them to focus in school or elsewhere. If there is no solution for AHDH and it can not be treated with some kids "Educators may need to change their methods to keep the attention of stimulation-saturated" ( Elias). Also, during the reading Skinner came to my mind, and his theory about behaviorism. Behaviorsm's definition of ADHD states that " The dynamic developmental behavioral theory is based on the hypothesis that altered dopaminergic function plays a pivotal role by failing to modulate nondopaminergic (primarily glutamate and GABA) signal transmission appropriately" ( Sagvolden etc.). It focuses on how all behaviors are learned from our surroundings, which explains that kids who only watch TV screens, and don't do any other activities such as reading, hiking, or sports.. are more likely to have ADHD.  As is noticed I used additional sources because there was not enough data and information; that is why this article proves that the research could have been done better. In the society that we live in, ADHD is very common about "9.4% between ages of 2 to 17 in the US" ( Zauderer). 

Thank you for reading, I hope that sometime I can discuss with some of you about Freud and his theory! 


References: 

Steven Zauderer, “45 ADHD Statistics: How Many People Have ADHD?” CrossRiverTheraphy, January 11, 2004.

https://www.crossrivertherapy.com/adhd-statistics#:~:text=ADHD%20in20Adults&text=In%20the%20U.S.%2C%20studies%20indicate,than%20in%20other%20ethnic%20groups.

Sagvolden, etc. A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes.  Pubmed, June 2005. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16209748/#:~:text=The%20dynamic%20developmental%20behavioral%20theory,and%20GABA)%20signal%20transmission%20appropriately.

Elias, M. (2004, August 30). Frequent TV Watching Shortens Kids’ Attention Spans. USA Today. www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-04-05-tv-kids-attention-usat_x.htm.





515 words

In reply to Jovana Dermanovic

Re: Discussion #1

by Lillian Farrar -

Hello Jovana,


Thank you for sharing your insight. I think you worded your response very well, and made some excellent points. I could not agree more or have worded it better myself. It is clearly shown throughout both pieces of research that their were slips, due to the lack of information shared in the final product, and other factors displayed. With cross-sectional research, you are correct in it taking less time than other methods, which is helpful at times. However,I would also like to add that quicker does not always mean better. By choosing such a method, in comparision to others, the aim for scientific accuracy falls short like you have stated. I hope to discuss more with you soon. 


Thank you,

Lilly Kate Farrar

125 words

In reply to Jovana Dermanovic

Re: Discussion #1

by Sara Bailey -

Hi Jovana!

I loved reading your post. You did an amazing job wording and explaining all the data you find. I agree with your opinion about the research not being good. I really liked how you went into detail about each of the studies and pointed out the flaws in each. I also really liked how you talked about Freud's findings and connected it with the study. I did not know ADHD could not be treated for some kids! I thought it was interesting how you pointed out that a lot of the kids with these problems might only be watching TV, and not doing anything physical or outside.

109 words

In reply to Jovana Dermanovic

Re: Discussion #1

by Rebecca Heyworth -

Hey Jovana,


I love how you connected Freud's theories to your response. You’ve done a great job pointing out the strengths and weaknesses in these articles. Your analysis was very impressive. I hadn’t heard of Skinner’s behaviorism theory before, I will definitely be researching that on my own. Tying it all in with suggesting the link between the development of ADHD and the activities the children participate in, was a very interesting aspect of your response. I do love how much detail you went into on each flaw you pointed out in each study. I truly loved reading your post, I look forward to more in the future. 

Becca Heyworth


111 words