Farrar Discussion #3

Farrar Discussion #3

by Lillian Farrar -
Number of replies: 2

1.

a. I found that the Five Factor Test was almost directly and accurately correlated with my personality. My percentages were relatively balanced. Some were higher than others, however, no results were cast to the extreme, which is true to my behavior.

b. I found the entire test insightful. I was surprised to see how my traits have morphed over a short period. My results presently,  would differ from those when I was younger. Over time my extraversion has leaned toward openness and conscientiousness tendencies.

   2.

a. Regarding, Maslow's Hierarchy, I believe that a majority of people reach at least the levels of psychological, safety, and love needs for these are easier accessed, and accepted. With or without this foundation, it is a known fact that humans are complex which makes such concepts harder to reach. 

b.  I think the reason why esteem and self-actualization concepts are not often reached is that we are living in a time where mental health is more a dire need than ever. Newer technology offers access to resources that only encourage bad self-esteem, and build false expectations of how life should look. 

c. I do not think it is humanly possible to reach full, and complete self-actualization. "The highest need is the need for self-actualization, which is the achievement of our fullest potential" (p. 385 Spielman). Such full potential is impossible for humans are imperfect creatures, that should, and are consistently striving to find the best version of themselves. This idea can shift, and change based on experience, time, and self-growth.



257 words

In reply to Lillian Farrar

Re: Farrar Discussion #3

by Raegan Duncan -

Thank you for sharing!! I like how you made the connection between the different parts of the five-factor test by talking about how your extraversion has changed over time. I can relate to this, as I feel like I have become less and less extroverted over time. I also thought that it was cool how you connected the explanation of why many do not reach the upper tiers of Maslow's Hierarchy to problems of today's world like social media and the mental health state of our world. I didn't really think about it in this way, so it is always great to get new insight. 

105 words

In reply to Lillian Farrar

Re: Farrar Discussion #3

by Joliet Okoronkwo -

You've provided some thoughtful reflections on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and the challenges people face in reaching the higher levels. Indeed, the foundational levels of physiological, safety, and love needs are more accessible and often prioritized, as they are essential for survival and well-being. These basic needs create a stable foundation for higher-level pursuits. However, the complexity of human nature and individual circumstances can indeed make it challenging to reach the self-actualization level. Your point about the impact of technology and the influence it has on self-esteem and expectations is quite relevant. In the digital age, social media and online content can contribute to unrealistic standards and negatively affect self-esteem. Mental health issues, often exacerbated by these external pressures, have become a significant concern in modern society. Your perspective on self-actualization is valid. Self-actualization is a continuous journey rather than a fixed destination. Humans are ever-evolving, and the pursuit of their fullest potential can vary based on life experiences and personal growth. The concept of self-actualization, as described by Maslow, implies a process of ongoing improvement and self-discovery rather than a static achievement. Your insights emphasize the dynamic and evolving nature of human needs and the challenges that arise in today's complex, technology-driven world. It's essential to recognize that people's paths to self-actualization are unique and influenced by individual experiences and circumstances.

222 words